Anthropic Disables Advanced AI Models Following US Government Order
The company has cut off access to its newest technology due to national security concerns.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
Anthropic has decided to turn off its most powerful AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5. This follows a direct order from the US government to block access for foreign nationals. The government claims there are national security risks related to how the models could be used. Anthropic disagrees with the decision and says the government provided little evidence. The move highlights growing tension between AI companies and government regulators.
Anthropic 已決定關閉其最強大的 AI 模型 Fable 5 與 Mythos 5。此舉是為了遵循美國政府禁止外籍人士使用的直接命令。政府聲稱這些模型的使用方式存在國家安全風險。Anthropic 不同意此決定,並表示政府提供的證據不足。此舉凸顯了 AI 企業與政府監管機構之間日益緊張的關係。
Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞
This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.
- Anthropic Stops Access to Advanced AI Models After Government Order
· 2026年6月14日
The AI company Anthropic has decided to turn off its most powerful models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5. This decision follows a direct order from the United States government regarding national security. The government is worried that these models could be used to bypass safety rules, a process known as 'jailbreaking'. Anthropic disagrees with the order, stating that the risks are minor and not unique to their software. The company is now working to follow the rules while expressing frustration over the lack of clear evidence.
The artificial intelligence company Anthropic has announced that it will stop access to its most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5. This decision follows a direct order from the United States government, which cited national security concerns. According to The Guardian Technology, the company will "abruptly disable" these models for all users to ensure it follows the new rules.
The government issued an export control directive—a set of rules that limits the movement of technology to other countries—requiring Anthropic to block access to these specific models for all foreign nationals. As reported by The Verge, this order applies to people both inside and outside the United States, including some of the company’s own employees. To meet these strict requirements, Anthropic decided that it had to cut off access to the models for all customers completely.
Anthropic stated that the government did not provide specific details about the security risks. Instead, the company claims that the evidence provided was only verbal and described a potential "jailbreak." In the world of technology, a jailbreak is a method used to bypass or break the safety rules that stop an AI from doing something it should not do. The government reportedly believes that these models could be used to find software vulnerabilities, which are weak points in computer systems that hackers might attack.
This situation marks a significant moment in the relationship between the US government and AI developers. For many years, US export controls have focused on physical items, such as the computer chips used to power AI. However, this new action shows that the government is now focusing on the software and the AI models themselves. The Verge noted that Anthropic believes the vulnerabilities discovered by the government are minor and that other AI models from rival companies have similar abilities.
There is clear disagreement between the two sides. Anthropic argued that it had worked closely with the US and UK governments on safety before launching its models. The company also pointed out that it has guardrails—safety features designed to prevent misuse—that stop the models from being used in risky areas like cyber-attacks. "We disagree that the finding of a narrow potential jailbreak should be cause for recalling a commercial model deployed to hundreds of millions of people," the company said in a statement cited by The Guardian Technology.
Not everyone agrees with the company's position. Kirsten Davies, the chief information officer for the Pentagon, shared her thoughts on the social media platform X. She stated that the defense department supports prioritizing national security over business goals. "Some things are simply more important than revenue cycles, clickbait and pre-IPO valuation. America First. Always," Davies wrote.
This event comes at a difficult time for Anthropic, which recently filed for an IPO—a process where a private company offers its shares to the public for the first time. The company’s relationship with the government has been tense for some time. Earlier this year, Anthropic refused to let the US military use its AI for domestic surveillance or weapons systems. Because of this, the government placed Anthropic on a supply chain blacklist, which is a list of companies that are restricted from doing business with certain government partners.
Looking ahead, this situation highlights the growing tension between AI developers and government regulators. While Anthropic has previously called for more government oversight of AI, it argued that this specific action did not follow fair or fact-based rules. As the government continues to try to halt the AI capabilities of foreign adversaries, companies like Anthropic find themselves caught in the middle of a complex and changing legal landscape. For now, users of Fable 5 and Mythos 5 will have to wait to see if access is restored or if these models will remain unavailable.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.According to the article, why did Anthropic decide to completely disable access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 for all users?
- 推論 Inference
2.What can be inferred about the relationship between Anthropic and the US government?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the fifth paragraph, what does the word 'guardrails' mean in the context of AI development?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the central message of the article?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- block verb
- To prevent someone from using or accessing something.
- 阻擋、禁止使用。
- 💡 常見作名詞(街區、積木),這裡作動詞用。文中:requiring Anthropic to block access to these specific models for all foreign nationals.
- cut off phrasal verb
- To stop the supply or access of something completely.
- 切斷、中斷(供應或連結)。
- 💡 此片語在此處表示完全停止提供服務,而非字面上的「切斷」。文中:Anthropic decided that it had to cut off access to the models for all customers completely.
- halt verb
- To stop something from continuing or moving.
- 停止、阻礙。
- 💡 常見作名詞(停止),這裡作動詞用。文中:As the government continues to try to halt the AI capabilities of foreign adversaries, companies like Anthropic find themselves caught in the middle of a complex and changing legal landscape.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite