English News / 英文新聞閱讀
科技 · Technology · · 728 words · B1-B2

Australia Moves to Give Users Control Over Social Media Algorithms

New proposed laws aim to let users choose between personalized feeds and chronological content from friends.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The Australian government has announced new legislation to give social media users more control over their feeds. Under the proposed 'Digital Duty of Care' bill, users over 16 could opt out of algorithmic recommendations. This move follows previous efforts to ban children under 16 from major social media platforms. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese states the goal is to empower users rather than increase government control. Tech companies could face massive fines if they fail to comply with these new safety and transparency requirements.

澳洲政府宣布了一項新法案,旨在讓社群媒體使用者對其動態牆擁有更多控制權。根據擬議的「數位照護責任」法案,十六歲以上的使用者將可選擇退出演算法推薦。此舉延續了先前禁止十六歲以下兒童使用大型社群媒體平台的政策。總理艾班尼斯表示,目標是賦予使用者權力,而非擴大政府控制。若科技公司未能遵守這些新的安全與透明度要求,將面臨鉅額罰款。

Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞

This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.

  • The Road Ahead: Unresolved Questions and Future Paths · 2026年9月7日

    This final part of our series explores the future of digital identity. We look at how decentralized technology can give users control over their data. We also discuss the challenges of creating global standards and the role of citizens in demanding privacy.

閱讀模式 ·

The Australian government has announced a major new plan to change how social media works for its citizens. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese introduced draft legislation that would allow users to opt out of the algorithms that currently decide what content appears on their screens. An algorithm is a set of computer rules that platforms use to pick and show posts, videos, and ads based on a user's past behavior. By choosing to opt out, users could instead see a simple feed that only shows content from the friends and creators they have chosen to follow, similar to how social media functioned over a decade ago.

This initiative, which the government calls "My Feed, My Way," is part of a broader "Digital Duty of Care" bill. According to NPR, the law aims to provide users over the age of 16 with genuine and lasting control over their digital experience. Prime Minister Albanese told reporters in Canberra that the goal is not to give the government control over the internet, but to give that power back to the people. He emphasized that the government intends to hold big technology companies responsible for their actions, noting that platforms failing to follow the new rules could face significant financial penalties, with fines potentially reaching over 100 million Australian dollars.

This proposal follows Australia’s recent history of strict internet regulation. As reported by Deutsche Welle, Australia became the first country to restrict social media access for children under 16 in 2025. Following that decision, other nations including Germany, Spain, France, Denmark, and New Zealand began drafting their own similar age-based restrictions. The new legislation also seeks to protect children from harmful content, such as material promoting eating disorders, crime, or dangerous stunts, as well as features designed to be addictive or damaging to a young person's self-esteem.

However, the path to making these changes a reality may be difficult. The Guardian Technology reports that while the idea of a "choose your own adventure" feed sounds promising, the success of the law depends heavily on how tech companies choose to implement it. In the past, companies have often hidden safety features deep within settings menus, making them hard for average users to find. Furthermore, there is a risk that companies might make the "opt-out" experience intentionally clunky or difficult to use, hoping that users will simply give up and return to the standard, algorithm-driven feed.

There are also concerns regarding how these platforms will respond to the new rules. Some tech companies have already expressed opposition to such regulations, arguing that strict rules might push young users toward less safe, unregulated online spaces. In Europe, similar attempts to force platforms to offer non-algorithmic feeds have faced legal challenges. For instance, a Dutch court had to intervene in 2025 after it was discovered that a major platform was automatically switching users back to its algorithm even after they had selected a different option.

Despite these challenges, the Australian government remains firm. The online safety watchdog in Australia has already been considering legal action against major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, claiming they have not done enough to keep children under 16 off their services. With the new bill expected to be approved by the Australian Parliament later this year, the pressure on these companies to change their design practices is increasing.

Ultimately, the debate highlights a growing global tension between the business models of big tech companies and the desire for safer, more transparent digital environments. While the government hopes this legislation will stop the spread of "outrage bait"—content designed specifically to make people angry or upset to increase engagement—the effectiveness of the law will depend on whether the platforms truly cooperate or find new ways to prioritize their own profits over user choice. For now, Australian users are waiting to see if they will finally be able to reclaim control over their own digital feeds.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

共 4 題

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.What is the primary function of the proposed 'opt-out' feature for Australian social media users?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.Based on the article, why might the 'My Feed, My Way' initiative fail to achieve its goal?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the final paragraph, what does the term 'outrage bait' refer to?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central theme of this article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

opt out phrasal verb
To choose not to participate in or use a system or service.
選擇不參與、退出(某種機制或服務)。
💡 此片語在科技語境中常見,指主動選擇關閉某項功能。文中:Prime Minister Anthony Albanese introduced draft legislation that would allow users to opt out of the algorithms that currently decide what content appears on their screens.
clunky adjective
Awkward, slow, or difficult to use.
笨拙的、難用的、不順手的。
💡 常用於形容軟體介面設計不佳,操作起來很卡。文中:Furthermore, there is a risk that companies might make the "opt-out" experience intentionally clunky or difficult to use, hoping that users will simply give up and return to the standard, algorithm-driven feed.
bait noun
Something used to trick or lure someone into doing something or reacting in a certain way.
誘餌、引誘物。
💡 原指釣魚用的「魚餌」,這裡引申為刻意設計來引發情緒反應的內容。文中:While the government hopes this legislation will stop the spread of "outrage bait"—content designed specifically to make people angry or upset to increase engagement—the effectiveness of the law will depend on whether the platforms truly cooperate or find new ways to prioritize their own profits over user choice.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite