English News / 英文新聞閱讀
科技 · Technology · · 668 words · B1-B2

Delaware Proposal to Allow AI-Run Businesses Sparks Federal Concern

A new plan to let artificial intelligence manage companies faces pushback from US lawmakers over legal responsibility.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

Delaware is considering a new law that would allow companies to be managed entirely by artificial intelligence. This proposal would create a special category of business known as an Artificial Intelligence Company. However, US Representative James Comer has raised serious concerns about the plan. He worries that these businesses could avoid legal responsibility for harmful actions. The state hopes the move will attract more companies and increase tax revenue.

德拉瓦州正在研擬一項新法,允許公司完全由人工智慧進行管理。此提案將創造一種稱為「人工智慧公司」的特殊企業類別。然而,美國眾議員柯默對此計畫提出了嚴重疑慮。他擔心這些企業可能會規避有害行為的法律責任。該州則希望此舉能吸引更多公司並增加稅收。

閱讀模式 ·

Delaware is currently considering a bold new plan that could change how businesses operate. The state is looking at a proposal to allow companies to be managed entirely by artificial intelligence (AI) agents. If this plan becomes law, these businesses would be known as Artificial Intelligence Companies, or AICs. This idea is intended to make Delaware an even more attractive place for businesses to register, potentially bringing in more tax money and fees for the state.

According to a draft bill, these AI-run companies would be allowed to operate in almost any industry, as long as the purpose is legal. The only major exception is the banking industry. The draft suggests that AI agents could be given the power to manage the daily affairs and business decisions of the company without a human being in charge. To test this new idea, the state is proposing a 'regulatory sandbox'—a controlled environment where new rules can be tested for a limited time—that would last for 30 months.

While the state sees this as a way to lead in technology, the plan has faced strong criticism from federal officials. US Representative James Comer, who serves as the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, recently wrote a letter to Delaware Governor Matt Meyer. In this letter, Comer expressed deep concern about the potential for abuse under such a system.

Ars Technica reports that Comer is worried about how these companies would handle legal responsibility. He believes that if an AI makes a reckless or harmful decision, the human owners might use the AI status to avoid being held accountable. Comer stated that the committee is concerned the proposal could protect powerful companies and their investors from the consequences of their actions. He also mentioned fears that the plan could be used by groups to hide their activities from the public.

Because of these concerns, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has started a formal investigation. Comer is asking Delaware to provide documents related to how the proposal was created and what steps have been taken to study the safety risks of AI. According to the letter from Comer, the committee wants to understand how these AI-run businesses might impact the relationship between state and federal laws.

This investigation could lead to new federal laws that limit the power of individual states to create their own AI regulations. Comer noted that the committee’s work will help inform future legislative efforts, which could include rules to limit how states manage AI initiatives. By looking into Delaware’s plan, the federal government is signaling that it wants to ensure that technology does not outpace the laws designed to keep the public safe.

For Delaware, the stakes are high. The state is already a popular destination for businesses of all sizes because of its existing laws. By introducing the AIC model, officials hope to maintain that status and stay at the front of the technology industry. However, the pushback from Washington shows that balancing innovation with safety is a difficult task. As the discussion continues, the state must decide if the potential economic benefits are worth the risk of creating companies that operate without human oversight.

At this stage, the proposal remains a draft bill that has not yet been submitted to the Delaware state legislature. The coming months will be important as both state and federal officials continue to debate the future of AI in the business world. For now, the focus remains on whether a company can truly function ethically and legally when there is no human at the helm.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

共 4 題

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the draft bill, what is the specific limitation placed on the industries in which AICs can operate?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.What is the primary concern of Representative James Comer regarding the proposed AIC model?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the final paragraph, what does the phrase 'no human at the helm' mean?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central conflict discussed in the article regarding Delaware's AIC proposal?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

outpace verb
To develop or move faster than something else.
發展速度超過、跑得比……快。
💡 常見於描述速度,這裡指科技發展速度快過法律制定速度。文中:the federal government is signaling that it wants to ensure that technology does not outpace the laws designed to keep the public safe.
stakes noun (plural)
The risks involved in a situation; what can be gained or lost.
風險、賭注(指成敗攸關的事物)。
💡 常見作名詞(木樁),這裡指情勢的嚴重性或重要性。文中:For Delaware, the stakes are high.
at the helm idiom
In charge or in control of an organization or activity.
掌舵、負責、掌控大局。
💡 源自航海術語(舵),這裡比喻企業的決策者。文中:For now, the focus remains on whether a company can truly function ethically and legally when there is no human at the helm.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite