The High Price of High Consumption: How the Richest 10% Impact the Planet
A new study reveals that the world's wealthiest individuals cause trillions of dollars in environmental damage every year.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
A new study from the University of Oxford and the University of Leiden highlights the massive environmental cost of the world's top 10% of consumers. These individuals are responsible for up to $5.7 trillion in damage annually through their habits and investments. The research notes that this figure is larger than the economy of almost every country on Earth. Key drivers of this destruction include high levels of meat consumption and heavy reliance on fossil fuels for travel and home energy. Experts suggest that taxing these groups could help fund global efforts to protect nature and the climate.
來自牛津大學與萊頓大學的一項最新研究,凸顯了全球前百分之十的消費者所造成的巨大環境代價。這些人透過其生活習慣與投資,每年造成高達五點七兆美元的損害。研究指出,這個數字大於地球上幾乎所有國家的經濟規模。造成此種破壞的主要因素包括高肉類消費量,以及在交通與居家能源上對化石燃料的嚴重依賴。專家建議,對這些族群課稅將有助於資助全球保護自然與氣候的行動。
A new study has revealed the massive environmental cost caused by the world’s wealthiest people. According to The Guardian, the top 10% of the global population is responsible for up to $5.7 trillion in environmental damage every year. This amount is larger than the economy of every country in the world, except for the United States and China. Researchers from the University of Oxford and the University of Leiden calculated this figure by looking at the impacts of climate change, the loss of biodiversity (the variety of plant and animal life in the world), and the use of freshwater.
This group of 'mega-consumers' is mostly found in wealthier nations. The Guardian reports that these individuals make up more than half of the population in the United States and between 40% and 45% of people in the European Union. However, the study also notes that high-consuming households in emerging economies are catching up quickly. For example, the average environmental damage caused by the top 10% in China has now overtaken that of the top 10% in Germany.
What are these people doing that causes so much harm? The study points to two main areas: food and energy. In terms of food, eating red meat is a major cause of deforestation, which is the clearing of forests for farming. Regarding energy, the high cost comes from frequent flying and the heating or cooling of large homes. These activities usually rely on burning fossil fuels—natural resources like coal, oil, and gas that release harmful gases into the atmosphere when burned.
Researchers warn that these numbers might actually be too low. Paul Behrens, a professor at the University of Oxford and a co-author of the study, explained that the calculations only look at direct consumption. They do not include the environmental impact of investments, such as stocks and bonds. 'Research has shown that a large proportion of a rich person’s carbon footprint comes from what they own, not how they live,' Behrens said. A separate study by Greenpeace supports this, finding that the assets owned by the world’s richest 1% are linked to a quarter of all global emissions and cause nearly $1 trillion in climate damage every year.
Biodiversity loss is the biggest part of this environmental bill, accounting for over half of the total damage. The climate emergency—the current crisis of rising global temperatures—is responsible for most of the rest. The authors of the report argue that these two problems should be solved together rather than as separate issues. They suggest that governments could use 'polluter-pays' principles to address this. This means taxing luxury goods, wealth, and carbon emissions to make those who cause the most damage pay for the cleanup.
This approach could have two major benefits. First, it would help reduce pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Second, the money raised from these taxes could be used to support sustainability transitions, which are shifts toward cleaner energy and more eco-friendly ways of living. This would also help reduce economic inequality between the richest people and the rest of the world.
Beyond just their shopping habits, the top 10% have a unique role in the future of the planet. According to Professor Behrens, these individuals have 'outsized agency,' meaning they have a lot of power to change things. As investors, employers, and trendsetters, they influence how markets work and how businesses operate. If they change their habits and how they invest their money, they could help lead the world toward a more sustainable future.
Ultimately, the study highlights a difficult truth: economic priorities are currently focused on using up the Earth’s life-support systems. By identifying the specific groups responsible for the most damage, the researchers hope to provide a clear path for policy changes. Whether through new taxes or changes in investment, the goal is to stop the cycle of destruction and protect the environment for everyone.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.According to the study, which of the following is responsible for the largest portion of the environmental damage caused by the top 10%?
- 推論 Inference
2.What can be inferred about the true environmental impact of the world's wealthiest people?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the seventh paragraph, what does the phrase 'outsized agency' mean in the context of the top 10%?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the central argument of the article regarding the world's wealthiest people?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- catching up phrasal verb
- To reach the same level or standard as someone or something else.
- 趕上、追上(進度或水準)。
- 💡 常見於描述速度或成績,這裡指環境破壞程度追上已開發國家。文中:However, the study also notes that high-consuming households in emerging economies are catching up quickly.
- bill noun
- The cost or financial burden of something.
- 帳單、費用(引申為代價)。
- 💡 常見作「帳單」,這裡比喻環境破壞所造成的巨大代價。文中:Biodiversity loss is the biggest part of this environmental bill, accounting for over half of the total damage.
- agency noun
- The capacity or power to act and influence outcomes.
- 影響力、行動能力、自主權。
- 💡 常見作「代理機構」,這裡指個人改變現狀的權力或能力。文中:According to Professor Behrens, these individuals have 'outsized agency,' meaning they have a lot of power to change things.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite