English News / 英文新聞閱讀
經濟 · Economics · · 685 words · B1-B2

EU Issues Record Fine to AliExpress Over Unsafe Goods

Regulators claim the retail giant failed to protect consumers from dangerous products, while the company plans to fight the decision.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The European Union has issued a record €550 million fine against the online retailer AliExpress. Regulators found that the platform failed to stop the sale of dangerous items like unsafe toys and cosmetics. The European Commission stated that AliExpress did not have enough staff to properly check products for safety. AliExpress has rejected the fine, calling it disproportionate and unfair. The company intends to appeal the decision in court.

歐盟已對網路零售商全球速賣通開出 5 億 5000 萬歐元的破紀錄罰單。監管機構發現該平台未能阻止不安全玩具與化妝品等危險商品的銷售。歐盟執委會表示,全球速賣通沒有足夠的人力來妥善檢查產品安全性。全球速賣通拒絕接受此罰款,稱其不成比例且不公平,並打算向法院提出上訴。

Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞

This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.

  • EU Issues Record Fine to AliExpress Over Unsafe Goods · 2026年7月21日

    The European Union has fined AliExpress a record €550 million for allowing the sale of illegal, unsafe, and fake products. Regulators found that the platform failed to properly check items like dangerous toys and cosmetics. AliExpress has rejected the fine as unfair and plans to appeal the decision. This penalty is the largest ever issued under the Digital Services Act, which sets strict rules for online safety. The company must now present a plan to fix these issues by October 20.

閱讀模式 ·

The European Union has taken a major step in regulating online shopping by issuing a record €550 million fine against the Chinese retail platform AliExpress. This decision follows a long investigation into how the company manages the sale of illegal, fake, and potentially dangerous goods on its website. The fine is the largest ever imposed under the Digital Services Act (DSA), which is a set of European laws designed to make the internet safer and protect consumers from harmful content and products.

According to The Guardian, the European Commission found that AliExpress failed to stop the sale of items such as unsafe children’s toys, dangerous cosmetics, and kitchen gadgets. Henna Virkkunen, the commission’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, stated that the spread of these products is not an unavoidable part of online shopping. She argued that it is a clear failure by the company to meet its legal obligations. Virkkunen noted that scale is not an excuse, and companies must identify and address risks systematically to ensure consumers can shop safely.

Ars Technica reports that the European Commission discovered serious problems with how AliExpress handles product moderation. The investigation found that the company did not have enough staff to check the safety of items. Some moderators were reportedly given only "tens of seconds" to decide if a product met European standards. Because of this, many dangerous items that were flagged for removal stayed on the website for weeks or even months. Furthermore, the commission found that the platform’s own recommendation systems were actually helping to spread these illegal goods by suggesting them to shoppers.

Another issue highlighted by the investigation was how easily sellers could avoid safety rules. Ars Technica noted that some sellers simply mislabeled their products to bypass automatic safety checks. The platform’s brand authorization system was also described as ineffective, and the company reportedly failed to penalize traders who sold illegal items, despite claims that it would do so. This lack of oversight meant that for many sellers, the risk of being caught remained very low.

This is not the first time the European Union has targeted large retail platforms. Earlier this year, the platform Temu was fined €200 million for similar failures, and the social media company X was fined €120 million for issues related to transparency and deceptive verification badges. Officials noted that the fine against AliExpress was not just because illegal products were found, but because the company failed to build the necessary barriers to protect consumers from these risks in the first place.

In response to the news, AliExpress has strongly condemned the decision. The company described the fine as "disproportionate," a term meaning that the punishment is too large for the situation. In a public statement, AliExpress said it disagrees with the commission’s decision and claimed that the fine does not properly reflect the work it has already done to improve its safety systems. The company stated that it has a sound risk management framework and has made significant, proactive enhancements to its platform. As a result, AliExpress has announced that it will appeal the decision, taking the matter to a higher authority to challenge the penalty.

For consumers, the situation highlights the ongoing challenges of shopping on massive global platforms. While these sites offer low prices and a wide variety of goods, regulators are increasingly concerned about the quality and safety of what is being sold. The European Commission pointed out that one in five Europeans shops monthly at retail sites like AliExpress, Temu, and Shein, making the safety of these platforms a major priority for the bloc. As the legal battle between the European Union and AliExpress continues, the case serves as a warning to other tech companies that they must take responsibility for the products sold through their digital marketplaces.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.What specific operational failure did the European Commission identify regarding AliExpress's product moderation process?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.Based on the article, why does the European Commission believe that AliExpress's size is not a valid excuse for its safety failures?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the context of the article, what does the word 'disproportionate' mean as used by AliExpress?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.Which statement best summarizes the central message of the article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

flagged verb (past participle)
Marked or identified something as needing attention or being problematic.
標記、點出(問題或異常)。
💡 常見作名詞(旗幟),這裡作動詞,指將問題商品標記出來。文中:Because of this, many dangerous items that were flagged for removal stayed on the website for weeks or even months.
bypass verb
To avoid or go around a rule, system, or obstacle.
規避、繞過(規則或系統)。
💡 此詞在科技與法律語境中常指「規避」規則。文中:Ars Technica noted that some sellers simply mislabeled their products to bypass automatic safety checks.
sound adjective
Reliable, logical, and based on good judgment.
健全的、穩固的、可靠的。
💡 常見作名詞(聲音),這裡作形容詞,形容風險管理架構很完善。文中:The company stated that it has a sound risk management framework and has made significant, proactive enhancements to its platform.
bloc noun
A group of countries that work together for a common purpose.
集團、聯盟(指歐盟成員國)。
💡 此詞在國際新聞中專指政治或經濟聯盟,對學生來說較不常見。文中:The European Commission pointed out that one in five Europeans shops monthly at retail sites like AliExpress, Temu, and Shein, making the safety of these platforms a major priority for the bloc.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite