English News / 英文新聞閱讀
科技 · Technology · · 638 words · B1-B2

Meta Faces Massive $25 Billion Fine Over Privacy Scandal

A New Mexico judge orders the tech giant to pay for millions of violations related to user data.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

A judge in New Mexico has ordered Meta to pay $25 billion in penalties. The fine follows a jury decision regarding the company's handling of user data. This case is connected to the older Cambridge Analytica scandal. Meta has strongly disagreed with the ruling and plans to appeal. The decision is one of the largest financial penalties ever given to a company in the United States.

新墨西哥州一名法官裁定 Meta 須支付 250 億美元罰款。此罰款源於陪審團針對該公司處理用戶資料方式的裁決,此案與早期的劍橋分析醜聞有關。Meta 強烈反對該裁決並計畫上訴。這項決定是美國史上對企業開出的最高額財務懲罰之一。

閱讀模式 ·

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, is facing a major legal challenge after a judge in New Mexico ordered it to pay $25 billion in penalties. This decision follows a jury ruling from September, which found that the company misled its users about how their personal information was protected. The case is a result of the long-running Cambridge Analytica scandal, where a political consulting firm collected data from millions of Facebook accounts without permission to influence voters.

According to The Verge, the court found that Meta committed more than 43 million violations of the state’s unfair practices law. The judge explained that the high number of violations, the long period of time they occurred, and the involvement of senior company leaders justified a very large penalty. While the law allowed for a much higher total, the judge reduced the final amount to $25 billion. Even at this lower amount, it remains one of the largest financial penalties ever issued against a corporation in the United States.

This legal battle began with a 2021 complaint. The state argued that Meta failed to prevent misinformation and hate speech on its platforms while also failing to protect user data. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez praised the result, stating that the case was about ensuring corporations face real consequences when they mislead the public about personal information. “New Mexico stood its ground, took this case to trial, and secured a verdict establishing millions of violations of our law,” Torrez said in a statement.

Meta has responded strongly to the ruling, suggesting that the decision will make it very difficult for companies to operate in the state. C.J. Mahoney, Meta’s chief legal officer, argued that the lawsuit is an attempt to control what people are allowed to say online. In an official statement, the company expressed confidence that they will win on appeal — a process where a higher court reviews a lower court's decision to see if it was correct. Meta maintains that the ruling is unfair and plans to fight the decision in the legal system.

This $25 billion fine is significantly larger than other recent costs Meta has faced. For example, the company recently agreed to pay $17.1 billion to settle various complaints regarding the safety of children online. However, that settlement included conditions, such as requiring other platforms like YouTube and TikTok to install similar safety measures. In another separate case in New Mexico, Meta was ordered to pay nearly $1 billion for misleading the public about the safety of its products.

Industry experts note that this ruling is part of a larger trend where states are taking a tougher stance on big technology companies. While Meta has managed to avoid some of the business changes requested by officials in other cases, the financial impact of these legal losses is growing. The company is now dealing with multiple legal challenges across the country, making this a difficult time for its leadership.

As the situation develops, the focus will likely shift to the appeals process. If the $25 billion fine is upheld, it will set a significant precedent for how states can hold global tech companies accountable for their actions. For now, the ruling serves as a warning to other large corporations that the way they handle user data and online content will be under close watch by government officials. The outcome of the appeal will be closely watched by legal experts and the technology industry alike, as it could change how companies manage their platforms in the future.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

共 4 題

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.What reason did the judge provide for the specific size of the $25 billion penalty imposed on Meta?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.Based on the article, what is Meta's primary strategy for dealing with the current legal outcome in New Mexico?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the fourth paragraph, what does the phrase 'stood its ground' mean in the context of the Attorney General's statement?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central message regarding the legal landscape for big technology companies as presented in the article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

stood its ground idiom
To maintain one's position and refuse to give in or retreat during a conflict.
堅持立場,不退讓。
💡 這是一個常見的慣用語,字面上是「站在自己的土地上」,這裡引申為在法律爭議中堅持到底。文中:New Mexico stood its ground, took this case to trial, and secured a verdict establishing millions of violations of our law
upheld verb (past participle)
To confirm or support the validity of a previous legal decision.
(法院)維持原判,確認判決有效。
💡 在法律語境中,upheld 指上級法院維持下級法院的判決,而非字面上的「舉起」。文中:If the $25 billion fine is upheld, it will set a significant precedent for how states can hold global tech companies accountable for their actions.
settle verb
To reach an official agreement to end a legal dispute, usually by paying money.
和解,透過協議解決法律糾紛。
💡 常見意思為「定居」或「解決問題」,但在法律新聞中常指「庭外和解」。文中:For example, the company recently agreed to pay $17.1 billion to settle various complaints regarding the safety of children online.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite