Meta Removes New AI Image Tool After Privacy Backlash
The company faced strong criticism from users and labor unions over how it used public photos for artificial intelligence.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
Meta has removed its new AI image feature, Muse Image, shortly after its launch. The tool allowed users to create images using public Instagram content. Many people and groups criticized the company for turning the feature on automatically. A major actors' union called the move a dangerous mistake regarding user privacy. Meta eventually decided to stop the feature, admitting it did not meet user expectations.
Meta 在推出新的人工智慧影像功能「繆思影像」後不久,便將其移除。該工具原先允許使用者利用公開的 Instagram 內容來創作影像。由於該功能被預設為自動開啟,引發許多民眾與團體的批評。一個主要的演員工會稱此舉為危險的隱私錯誤。Meta 最終決定停止該功能,並承認其未能符合使用者的期待。
Meta, the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, has decided to stop a new artificial intelligence feature just days after it was released. The tool, called Muse Image, was designed to let users create and edit images using content from public Instagram accounts. However, the feature was quickly removed following widespread complaints about how the company handles user privacy.
The feature was part of the Meta AI chatbot and was developed by the company’s Meta Superintelligence Labs. When it launched on Tuesday, it allowed people to use photos as a starting point to create new images or change them using simple sketches. While Meta intended for this to be a creative tool, many users were unhappy that the feature was turned on automatically, a process known as an 'opt-in' system where users are included by default unless they choose to leave.
According to The Guardian Technology, the backlash was immediate. Users were concerned that their personal photos could be used by others without clear permission. One of the most famous people to speak out was Emmy-winning actor Hannah Einbinder. She used her own Instagram account to warn her followers about the feature, telling them that it had been activated without their knowledge and encouraging them to turn it off.
The criticism was not limited to individual users. SAG-AFTRA, a large union that represents actors and other media professionals, also took a strong stand. On Thursday, the union told its members and all Instagram users to opt out of the feature. In a statement reported by The Guardian Technology, the union argued that any use of a person’s images for AI must require a 'clear and conspicuous' choice, meaning users should have to actively agree to it before it happens. They described the company's approach as an 'unacceptable' mistake that ignored the public's fear of how their digital images might be used by others.
Following this pressure, Meta released a statement explaining its decision to remove the tool. The company said that its goal was to provide a useful creative tool while giving people control over their content. However, they admitted that the feature 'missed the mark,' a common way of saying it failed to meet expectations or was not done correctly. Because of the negative feedback, the company decided to make it unavailable.
After Meta announced the removal of Muse Image, SAG-AFTRA expressed support for the decision. A spokesperson for the union noted that the dangers of creating digital copies of people without their agreement are well known. They added that a feature encouraging such behavior was 'unwise' and that stopping it was the 'responsible thing to do.'
This event highlights a growing conflict in the technology industry. As AI tools become more powerful, companies are under increasing pressure to be transparent about how they use public data. Many people are worried that their photos, videos, and writing are being used to train AI models without their consent. The quick reversal by Meta shows that technology companies are finding it harder to launch new features that rely on user content without giving people clear, easy ways to control their own information.
For now, the removal of Muse Image serves as a reminder of the power that users and organizations have when they speak out against privacy risks. As AI continues to change how we interact with social media, the debate over who owns and controls our digital identity will likely continue. Companies will need to find a better balance between innovation and the rights of the people who use their platforms every day.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.What specific action did the union SAG-AFTRA take in response to the Muse Image feature?
- 推論 Inference
2.Based on the text, why was the 'opt-in' system described in the article a significant issue for users?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the fifth paragraph, what does the phrase 'missed the mark' mean in the context of Meta's statement?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the central message regarding the conflict described in the article?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- speak out phrasal verb
- To express your opinion publicly and strongly, especially about something you believe is wrong.
- 公開發表意見(特別是針對不公義之事)。
- 💡 此片語由動詞 speak 與副詞 out 組成,意思並非字面上的「說出來」,而是指公開表達立場。文中:One of the most famous people to speak out was Emmy-winning actor Hannah Einbinder.
- took a strong stand idiom
- To express a firm and determined opinion about something.
- 採取強硬立場。
- 💡 此慣用語形容對某事採取堅定且明確的態度。文中:SAG-AFTRA, a large union that represents actors and other media professionals, also took a strong stand.
- missed the mark idiom
- To fail to achieve the desired result or to fail to be accurate.
- 未達預期、失敗、沒抓到重點。
- 💡 字面意思為「沒射中靶心」,引申為未能達到標準或預期效果。文中:However, they admitted that the feature 'missed the mark,' a common way of saying it failed to meet expectations or was not done correctly.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite