New Research Links Hundreds of Pesticide Chemicals to Breast Cancer
Scientists warn that 'inactive' ingredients in common products may pose serious health risks.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
A new study has identified 485 chemicals in US pesticide products that are linked to breast cancer. These chemicals are found in items ranging from farm pesticides to home lawn fertilizers and lice treatments. Researchers argue that current government regulations are insufficient because they often ignore 'inert' ingredients. Many of these substances can disrupt hormones even at low levels of exposure. Experts are calling for stricter safety reviews to protect public health as cancer rates continue to rise.
一項新研究在美國的殺蟲劑產品中,發現了四百八十五種與乳癌有關的化學物質。這些化學物質存在於從農用殺蟲劑到居家草坪肥料及蝨子治療藥物等各類產品中。研究人員認為,目前的政府法規因經常忽略「惰性」成分而顯得不足。許多這類物質即使在低劑量接觸下,也能干擾荷爾蒙。隨著癌症發生率持續上升,專家正呼籲採取更嚴格的安全審查以保護公共健康。
A new scientific study has raised serious concerns about the safety of everyday products. Researchers have identified 485 chemicals used in pesticide products in the United States that are linked to breast cancer. This discovery comes at a time when breast cancer rates are increasing worldwide, especially among women under the age of 50. According to the American Cancer Society, breast cancer is the most common cancer in the US, and the number of cases has been rising by about 1% every year.
The research, published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, suggests that current government rules for testing pesticides are not enough to protect the public. The study was conducted by the Silent Spring Institute, a non-profit organization focused on environmental health. Jenny Kay, a co-author of the report, explained that people are exposed to these chemicals in many ways. These substances are not only used on large farms; they are also found in common household items like lawn fertilizers, flea and tick treatments for pets, and even lice treatments used on children’s scalps.
A major issue highlighted by the study is how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies ingredients. Pesticide products contain "active" ingredients, which are designed to kill pests, and "inert" or inactive ingredients, which help the product work better. The EPA requires active ingredients to go through safety reviews, but it often does not give the same attention to inert ingredients. Jenny Kay noted that these substances are not actually harmless to humans. She explained that they are only called "inert" because they do not target the pest directly, but the human body does not distinguish between active and inactive ingredients. In some cases, these inert substances include "forever chemicals," which are known to be difficult for the environment and the human body to break down.
According to The Guardian Environment, the EPA only looks at the risks of each chemical one by one. It does not consider the danger of the entire pesticide formula or the risk of being exposed to many different chemicals at the same time. Scientists say this is a "regulatory blind spot"—a gap in the rules that allows potentially dangerous substances to be used without enough testing. The Silent Spring Institute found that only about 145 of the 485 identified chemicals are registered with the EPA as active ingredients. This suggests that the chemical industry may be using the "inert" label to avoid strict health checks.
Another concern is how these chemicals affect the human body. Some of these substances are hormone-disrupting, meaning they can change the way hormones work in the body. The study points out that some chemicals can cause disease even at very low levels of exposure. However, the EPA has sometimes dismissed these risks because it expects chemicals to be more dangerous only at higher levels. This way of thinking ignores the reality that even small amounts of certain chemicals can be harmful over a long period.
Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey shows that at least 84 of these breast cancer-linked chemicals are already present in the general population. Researchers believe this number is likely much higher because current testing does not track most of the compounds identified in the new study. Beyond pesticides, the Silent Spring Institute has also found similar chemicals in drinking water and many other consumer goods.
Public health advocates are now calling for a change in how these products are regulated. Despite these calls, the path forward remains difficult. The Guardian Environment reports that the EPA rejected a legal request in 2023 to start more strictly reviewing inert ingredients. Furthermore, some critics have pointed out that top officials in the EPA’s chemical safety offices have previously worked as lobbyists for the chemical industry, which may influence how these rules are managed.
As cancer rates continue to rise, the debate over chemical safety is becoming more urgent. For now, the study serves as a warning that the products we use in our homes and on our food may have hidden risks. Experts argue that until the government changes its approach to testing entire formulas rather than just individual ingredients, the public will remain exposed to chemicals that could have long-term effects on their health.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.According to the Silent Spring Institute's findings, what is the status of the 485 chemicals linked to breast cancer regarding EPA registration?
- 推論 Inference
2.What can be inferred about the chemical industry's use of the 'inert' label?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the fourth paragraph, what does the phrase 'regulatory blind spot' mean?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the primary message of this article?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- raised verb
- To bring up or cause to be considered (a concern or question).
- 提出(問題或疑慮)。
- 💡 常見作「舉起」或「增加」,這裡指提出疑慮。文中:A new scientific study has raised serious concerns about the safety of everyday products.
- dismissed verb
- To decide that something is not important enough to consider.
- 不予理會、認為不重要而排除。
- 💡 常見作「解僱」或「解散」,這裡指對風險不予重視。文中:However, the EPA has sometimes dismissed these risks because it expects chemicals to be more dangerous only at higher levels.
- blind spot noun (idiom)
- A situation where someone fails to notice or address a problem.
- 盲點;未被注意到的缺失。
- 💡 原指駕駛視線死角,這裡比喻法規上的漏洞。文中:Scientists say this is a "regulatory blind spot"—a gap in the rules that allows potentially dangerous substances to be used without enough testing.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite