English News / 英文新聞閱讀
能源 · Energy · · 732 words · B1-B2

The Hidden Cost of Sand: Why Our Modern World is Running Out

As global demand for construction grows, the race to extract sand is damaging the environment and threatening the future of coastal communities.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

Sand is the most used solid material on Earth, essential for building homes, roads, and modern technology like solar panels. However, a new UN report warns that we are using sand much faster than nature can replace it. This rapid extraction is destroying coral reefs and harming fishing communities in places like the Maldives, the Philippines, and Indonesia. Experts argue that we must change how we manage this resource to protect our ecosystems. Better planning and stricter environmental rules are necessary to balance development with the needs of the natural world.

沙子是地球上使用量最大的固體材料,對於建造房屋、道路以及太陽能板等現代科技至關重要。然而,聯合國的一份新報告警告,我們消耗沙子的速度遠快於大自然的再生速度。這種快速開採正在破壞珊瑚礁,並傷害馬爾地夫、菲律賓和印尼等地的漁業社區。專家主張,我們必須改變管理這項資源的方式以保護生態系統。更好的規劃與更嚴格的環境法規,對於平衡發展與自然世界的需求是必要的。

閱讀模式 ·

When we think about the materials that build our modern world, we often think of steel, glass, or concrete. Yet, there is one ingredient that is more important than all of these: sand. It is the most extracted solid material on Earth. Every year, humans use about 50 billion tonnes of sand to build homes, roads, and large buildings. It is also a key part of making windows, computer chips, and solar panels. However, a new report from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warns that we are using sand much faster than nature can replace it. This is creating a global crisis that threatens both our environment and our future.

For many countries, sand is seen as a simple solution to urgent problems. In the Maldives, for example, the capital city of Malé is very crowded and faces the risk of rising sea levels caused by climate change. To create more space for people, the government has used land reclamation projects. This process involves taking sand from the ocean floor to build up new land. According to The Guardian, this seemed like a logical plan at first. However, the environmental cost has been very high.

In 2019, the Maldives government hired a company to fill in a lagoon near Malé. This project required a massive amount of sand to be taken from the sea. An environmental study later found that the damage caused by this project could not be fixed. The project destroyed 200 hectares of coral reefs and important ocean habitats. The UN report noted that about half of all dredging companies—businesses that remove sand from the bottom of the sea—are operating in protected areas. This destruction harms fish, turtles, and birds, which are vital for local ecosystems and tourism.

This problem is not limited to the Maldives. In the Philippines, a large airport project required the removal of 155 million cubic metres of sand from Manila Bay. The result was devastating for local fishing communities. Once the sea floor was scraped away, the fish did not return, leaving many people without their main source of income. Similarly, in South Sulawesi, Indonesia, dredging sand for a city project caused fishing incomes to drop by 80 percent. These stories show that while sand is an "unrecognised hero" of development, its removal often comes at a terrible price for those who live near the coast.

Pascal Peduzzi, the director of the UNEP global resource information database, explained that sand plays a critical role in protecting our planet. It acts as a natural shield against rising sea levels, storm surges, and the salt that can ruin fresh water in coastal areas. When we remove sand, we make these climate-related hazards much worse. There is a difficult competition between using sand for construction and leaving it in place to protect the environment. As Peduzzi noted, the role of sand in supporting the natural services we depend on is often ignored.

So, what can be done? The UN report suggests that we need a complete change in how we manage sand extraction. Currently, there is a lack of transparency, meaning that many projects go forward without enough public oversight or care for the environment. Planners need better data and mapping to identify areas that are too important to touch. They must also follow environmental rules much more strictly than they do today.

As the world continues to grow, the demand for sand will likely increase. We are at a point where we must decide if we can continue with the current pace of development or if we need to find a more sustainable way forward. The Maldives, where over 80 percent of the land is less than one metre above sea level, is a clear example of how vulnerable we are. If we continue to destroy the very things that protect our coasts, we may find that the cost of our modern buildings is far higher than we ever imagined.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the article, what specific environmental damage occurred during the land reclamation project in the Maldives?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.What can be inferred about the relationship between sand extraction and climate change?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the fourth paragraph, what does the author mean by calling sand an 'unrecognised hero' of development?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central message of the article regarding sand extraction?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

build up phrasal verb
To increase the size or height of something, often by adding material.
增建、堆高、擴建。
💡 此處指透過填海來增加土地面積,而非單純的「建立」。文中:This process involves taking sand from the ocean floor to build up new land.
scraped away phrasal verb
To remove a layer of something from a surface by pulling a tool or machine across it.
刮除、剷除。
💡 形容海底被大規模挖掘移除的過程,強調表面被剷平的狀態。文中:Once the sea floor was scraped away, the fish did not return, leaving many people without their main source of income.
go forward phrasal verb
To continue or proceed with a plan or project.
進行、推動(計畫)。
💡 常見作「向前走」,這裡指計畫在缺乏監督的情況下持續進行。文中:Currently, there is a lack of transparency, meaning that many projects go forward without enough public oversight or care for the environment.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview