US Government Moves to Let Private Companies Hack Foreign Criminals
A new program aims to use private businesses to fight cybercrime, but experts raise concerns about safety and legal risks.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
The Trump administration has announced a plan to allow private companies to conduct cyberattacks against foreign criminals. This program marks a major change in how the U.S. handles digital threats. Participating firms will work under contracts with the Department of Justice or the Department of Homeland Security. Experts are questioning how these companies will be managed and what legal rules they must follow. The move has sparked debate about the risks of letting private businesses perform tasks usually reserved for the government.
川普政府宣布了一項計畫,允許民間企業對外國犯罪分子進行網路攻擊。此計畫標誌著美國處理數位威脅方式的重大改變。參與的企業將在與司法部或國土安全部簽訂的合約下運作。專家們質疑這些公司將如何被管理,以及必須遵守哪些法律規範。此舉引發了關於讓民間企業執行通常由政府保留之任務所帶來風險的辯論。
Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞
This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.
- US Government to Allow Private Companies to Conduct Cyberattacks
· 2026年8月14日
The Trump administration has announced a new program allowing private security firms to carry out cyberattacks against overseas criminal groups. These companies will work under the supervision of the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security. The initiative targets groups involved in ransomware, fraud, and other cybercrimes. However, experts warn that the plan carries significant legal and safety risks. Critics also worry that these operations could accidentally harm innocent people or create international tension.
The Trump administration has introduced a new program that could change how the United States handles digital threats. According to NPR News, the government is creating a system to allow private companies to hack into the networks of foreign cybercriminals. This plan represents a significant shift in policy, as such work has traditionally been performed only by government agencies.
This announcement follows previous reports from earlier this week about the government's intention to authorize private firms to carry out cyberattacks. Under the new plan, companies will not act on their own. Instead, they must sign contracts with the Department of Justice or the Department of Homeland Security. These companies will undergo a process called “rigorous vetting,” which means the government will carefully check their background and abilities before allowing them to participate. Additionally, companies must set aside $1 million, which the government can take if the company fails to follow the rules of the contract.
Joshua Steinman, who worked on cyber policy for the National Security Council during President Trump’s first term, noted that this program could target groups involved in organized crime or money laundering. He suggested that many companies might see this as a way to gain more government work and improve their reputation. However, the exact details of how these companies will be chosen, or how the government will select which foreign groups to attack, remain unclear. The presidential memo does not fully explain how private businesses will take the lead on tasks like spying or disrupting computer systems, which are usually handled by the state.
While the idea has received support from some who believe it will help the U.S. fight back against digital threats, others are more cautious. Arthur Tellis, a former Department of Defense staffer, believes that private companies might be better at watching criminals than actually stopping them. He pointed out that these firms are likely looking for opportunities to increase their visibility or get more resources from the government. Some experts also worry about the legal side of the plan. Current U.S. laws generally stop people and businesses from hacking into computer networks, with only a few exceptions for law enforcement. The new memo does not change these laws, which creates questions about how these private attacks will be justified in court.
This initiative has been compared by some to the concept of “privateers.” In the 16th century, privateers were private ships that were given permission by a government to attack enemy vessels during times of war. While the current memo does not give private companies the same level of freedom as historical privateers, the idea has gained interest among some lawmakers. Two Republican congressmen have already proposed legislation that would encourage this kind of partnership between the government and private firms to take the fight to foreign hackers.
Despite the interest, there are still many unanswered questions. It is not yet clear which companies will actually want to take part in this program. Historically, private corporations have worked with the federal government, but they have usually played a support role rather than acting as digital saboteurs. The government has not yet provided clear information on the types of attacks that will be allowed or how it will prevent these private actions from causing unintended problems. As the administration moves forward, the public and industry experts will be watching closely to see how the government manages the risks of letting private businesses enter the world of international cyber operations.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.What is required of private companies before they are permitted to participate in the government's cyber program?
- 推論 Inference
2.Based on the text, why might the new program face significant legal challenges?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the final paragraph, what does the word 'saboteurs' mean in the context of the article?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the central theme of this article?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- set aside phrasal verb
- To reserve or keep something (usually money) for a specific purpose.
- 撥出、預留(款項)。
- 💡 常見於日常對話,這裡指預留資金作為保證金。文中:Additionally, companies must set aside $1 million, which the government can take if the company fails to follow the rules of the contract.
- take the lead idiom
- To be the first or most important person/group to do something.
- 帶頭、居於領先地位。
- 💡 這裡指私人企業將在執行任務中扮演主導角色。文中:The presidential memo does not fully explain how private businesses will take the lead on tasks like spying or disrupting computer systems, which are usually handled by the state.
- take the fight to idiom
- To attack or confront an opponent in their own territory or field.
- 主動出擊、將戰火帶向對方。
- 💡 這是一個比喻用法,指主動對外國駭客採取攻擊行動。文中:Two Republican congressmen have already proposed legislation that would encourage this kind of partnership between the government and private firms to take the fight to foreign hackers.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite