English News / 英文新聞閱讀
經濟 · Economics · · 612 words · B1-B2

US Government Returns $100 Billion in Tariff Refunds

After a major court ruling, businesses receive money back from cancelled import taxes, while new trade policies spark further legal challenges.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The Trump administration has returned $100 billion to businesses following a Supreme Court ruling that declared previous import taxes unlawful. These tariffs, which are taxes on goods brought into the country, were originally collected under emergency economic powers. While many companies have received their money back, billions of dollars in claims are still being processed. Meanwhile, the government has introduced a new set of tariffs targeting dozens of nations. This move has led to a fresh lawsuit from a group of 25 US states that oppose the new taxes.

川普政府在最高法院裁定先前的進口稅違法後,已向企業退還一千億美元。這些關稅是針對進口商品徵收的稅款,最初是依據緊急經濟權力所徵收。雖然許多公司已收到退款,但仍有數十億美元的申請尚在處理中。與此同時,政府已針對數十個國家實施了一系列新關稅。此舉引發了二十五個美國州組成的團體對新稅項提出新的訴訟。

閱讀模式 ·

The US government has officially paid back $100 billion to businesses as part of a massive refund program. This money comes from what were known as “Liberation Day” tariffs—taxes on foreign goods entering the country that the Supreme Court later ruled were illegal. According to reports from BBC Business and The Guardian, this refund represents about 60% of the total $165 billion collected under the policy. The payments follow a significant legal decision in February, where judges decided that the president did not have the authority to use emergency powers to impose such broad taxes on imports.

Tariffs are taxes that importers pay when bringing products into the United States. While the government collects these taxes at the border, businesses often pass the extra costs to shoppers by raising retail prices. When the Supreme Court struck down the earlier measures, it forced the government to return the money to the companies that had originally paid it. According to BBC Business, major corporations like Amazon have already received large refunds, with the company’s finance chief stating that some of these funds would be used to lower store prices for customers.

However, the refund process is not yet complete. BBC Business reports that nearly $29 billion in potential refunds is still being reviewed by trade authorities. Additionally, about $1.6 billion remains stuck because some companies have not provided the necessary banking information to receive their money. US Customs and Border Protection officials continue to work through these remaining claims, meaning the total amount paid back to businesses is likely to grow in the coming months.

Despite the return of these funds, the debate over trade policy remains intense. President Trump has long argued that tariffs are a necessary tool to protect the US economy, encourage domestic production, and secure better trade deals. However, critics point out that these taxes can lead to higher costs for families. The Guardian notes that the federal budget deficit has reached $1.37 trillion in the first nine months of the fiscal year, even with the income generated from these various trade levies.

Following the February court ruling, the administration moved quickly to introduce new trade measures. After a temporary 10% universal tariff expired, the government replaced it with new taxes on 60 trading partners. These new levies, which range from 10% to 12.5%, target countries including the UK, Mexico, Canada, Australia, India, China, and the 27 member states of the European Union. The administration claims these new tariffs are necessary because these countries have failed to properly stop the use of forced labour in their supply chains.

This new policy has already faced strong opposition. A group of 25 US states has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the new tariffs are simply a way to bypass the Supreme Court’s earlier decision. According to The Guardian, the states claim that these new taxes cover nearly all US imports and are an illegal attempt to raise taxes on families and businesses. New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that the administration is “once again trying to illegally raise taxes” through these new measures. As the legal battle continues, the future of US trade policy remains uncertain, leaving both businesses and consumers waiting to see how these economic changes will affect prices and the broader market.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.What is the current status of the 'Liberation Day' tariff refund program?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.Based on the article, what can be inferred about the relationship between importers and retail prices?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the final paragraph, what does the word 'bypass' mean in the context of the states' lawsuit?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central theme of the article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

struck down phrasal verb
To officially declare that a law or rule is no longer valid.
(法院等)宣判法律或規定無效、廢除。
💡 常見於法律語境,指法院推翻先前的措施。文中:When the Supreme Court struck down the earlier measures, it forced the government to return the money to the companies that had originally paid it.
stuck adjective
Unable to move or progress.
卡住的、動彈不得的。
💡 這裡形容資金因缺乏資訊而無法發放,而非實體被卡住。文中:Additionally, about $1.6 billion remains stuck because some companies have not provided the necessary banking information to receive their money.
bypass verb
To avoid or ignore a rule, law, or official procedure.
規避、繞過(規則或法律)。
💡 原意指繞過路障,這裡指刻意避開法律限制。文中:A group of 25 US states has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the new tariffs are simply a way to bypass the Supreme Court’s earlier decision.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite