English News / 英文新聞閱讀
經濟 · Economics · · 682 words · B1-B2

US to Remove South Africa and Rwanda from Major Trade Program

The decision to end duty-free access for two key African nations marks a major shift in American economic policy.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The United States government plans to remove South Africa and Rwanda from the African Growth and Opportunity Act starting in 2027. This program has allowed these nations to export goods to the US without paying taxes for over two decades. US officials claim both countries have created unfair trade barriers and acted against American security interests. South African leaders are already looking for new trade partners to soften the economic impact. Meanwhile, Rwanda faces additional pressure due to its alleged involvement in regional conflicts.

美國政府計畫自二零二七年起,將南非與盧安達從「非洲成長與機會法案」中除名。該計畫過去二十多年來允許這些國家免稅出口商品至美國。美國官員聲稱兩國設立了不公平的貿易壁壘,且其行為違背了美國的安全利益。南非領導人已開始尋求新的貿易夥伴以減輕經濟衝擊。與此同時,盧安達因被指控涉入區域衝突而面臨額外壓力。

閱讀模式 ·

The United States government has announced a significant change to its economic relationship with Africa. According to Deutsche Welle (DW), President Donald Trump intends to remove South Africa and Rwanda from the African Growth and Opportunity Act, known as AGOA, beginning in January 2027. This program has been a central part of American trade policy for 26 years, allowing many sub-Saharan African countries to send thousands of products into the US market without paying import taxes, which are extra fees paid when goods enter a country.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer explained the decision in a recent statement. He noted that the governments of South Africa and Rwanda are engaging in practices that do not meet the requirements for staying in the program. Specifically, Greer mentioned that these countries have created trade barriers that hurt American businesses and have acted in ways that threaten US national security and foreign policy goals. However, the official statement did not provide specific examples of these barriers or the exact security concerns involved.

To understand why this matters, it is helpful to look at the history of the program. Introduced in 2000 by former President Bill Clinton, AGOA was designed to help African economies grow by providing easy access to the large American market. Currently, more than 30 countries participate in the program, which covers over 1,800 different types of products. To remain eligible, countries must follow certain rules, such as removing obstacles to trade, maintaining an open market economy, and respecting democratic principles like human rights and the rule of law.

South Africa is the largest partner in this program. In 2025 alone, the country exported $1.7 billion worth of goods to the US, including car parts, citrus fruit, and wine. Because of this, the news has caused concern within the country. The South African citrus industry warned that the change puts many jobs and the economic security of local communities at risk. They described the situation as a threat to their entire business chain on both sides of the ocean.

Despite these concerns, the South African government has responded calmly. According to the South African Trade Ministry, the country was already preparing for this possibility. They noted that AGOA exports make up only about 10% of their total exports to the US and only 1% of their total global trade. While the US remains an important partner, President Cyril Ramaphosa has suggested that South Africa must now look for new markets and build stronger trade deals with other international partners, such as China.

Rwanda faces a different set of challenges. The US has recently increased economic pressure on the nation due to its alleged support for the M23 rebel group in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Last week, the US government placed sanctions—official penalties used to force a change in behavior—on the Rwandan Defense Ministry, several individuals, and a gold refinery. The Rwandan government has denied having any ties to the M23 group. For Rwanda, the loss of AGOA access will affect major exports like coffee and minerals, which are important to its economy.

This move comes after President Trump extended the AGOA program earlier in February. The program is subject to regular reviews to ensure that participating countries are still following the rules. By removing these two nations, the US is signaling a shift in how it manages its economic partnerships in the region. As the 2027 deadline approaches, both South Africa and Rwanda will need to adjust their trade strategies to manage the loss of these benefits. For now, the global business community will be watching closely to see how these changes affect trade flows and diplomatic relations between the United States and the African continent.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

共 4 題

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the article, what is the primary reason the US government gave for removing South Africa and Rwanda from the AGOA program?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.What can be inferred about the impact of the AGOA removal on South Africa compared to Rwanda?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the final paragraph, the phrase 'signaling a shift' is used. What does 'shift' mean in this context?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central message of this article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

engaging in phrasal verb
To be involved in or participating in an activity or behavior.
參與、從事(某種行為或活動)。
💡 此片語常與「訂婚」混淆,但在這裡指涉行為。文中:He noted that the governments of South Africa and Rwanda are engaging in practices that do not meet the requirements for staying in the program.
make up phrasal verb
To constitute or form a specific part of a whole.
組成、構成(某整體的一部分)。
💡 常見作「化妝」或「編造」,這裡指比例構成。文中:They noted that AGOA exports make up only about 10% of their total exports to the US and only 1% of their total global trade.
subject to adjective phrase
Likely to be affected by or required to undergo something.
受制於、取決於、必須接受(某種規定或審查)。
💡 容易誤以為是「主題」,這裡指必須接受審查。文中:The program is subject to regular reviews to ensure that participating countries are still following the rules.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite