English News / 英文新聞閱讀
科技 · Technology · · 756 words · B1-B2

New Warnings Issued Over AI Risks to Children’s Privacy

Experts urge parents to limit public photos of children as AI-generated abuse material rises.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The National Crime Agency and the Internet Watch Foundation have released new guidance for parents. They warn that AI tools are being used to turn ordinary photos of children into harmful, fake sexual images. Criminals are increasingly using public social media posts to create this illegal content. Parents are now being encouraged to make their accounts private and review their sharing habits. This update follows a significant rise in AI-generated abuse material identified by safety organizations.

國家打擊犯罪調查局與網路觀察基金會發布了針對家長的新指導方針。他們警告,人工智慧工具正被用於將兒童的普通照片轉化為有害的虛假性影像。犯罪分子越來越常利用公開的社群媒體貼文來製作這些非法內容。家長現在被鼓勵將帳號設為私人並檢視自己的分享習慣。這項更新是在安全組織識別出人工智慧生成的虐待素材顯著增加後所發布的。

Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞

This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.

  • New Warning: Why Parents Should Think Twice Before Posting Children’s Photos Online · 2026年7月4日

    The National Crime Agency and the Internet Watch Foundation have issued new guidance for parents regarding online safety. They warn that AI tools are being used to create fake, harmful images of children from photos found on social media. Parents are encouraged to review their privacy settings and limit who can see their children's pictures. This advice follows a sharp rise in AI-generated abuse material identified by safety organizations. Experts emphasize that these steps are necessary to protect children from potential blackmail and exploitation.

閱讀模式 ·

Parents are being urged to stop sharing photos of their children on public social media accounts. This new warning comes from the National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF). These organizations are concerned about the rapid growth of AI-generated child sexual abuse material, often called CSAM. This is illegal content that shows children in sexual situations, even if the images were created by a computer rather than by photographing a real child.

According to the IWF, the number of these fake, harmful images and videos has risen sharply. In 2025, the organization identified more than 8,000 AI-generated pieces of abuse material, which is a 14% increase from the year before. Most concerning is the jump in AI-generated videos, which rose from 13 cases in 2024 to 3,440 in 2025. The NCA noted that many parents are unaware that their public posts are being used by criminals to create this material without ever needing to contact the children directly.

This issue is closely linked to the practice of "sharenting," a term used to describe parents who frequently share photos or videos of their children online. While many parents post these pictures to share happy memories with family and friends, experts warn that these images can be "scraped" or collected by criminals. These criminals then use AI tools to manipulate the photos, such as removing clothing or creating fake sexual content. The Guardian reports that some teenagers have already been blackmailed by people who threatened to share these fake images unless they received money or other favors.

To help families stay safe, the NCA and IWF have released specific guidance. They suggest that parents should review their privacy settings on all social media apps. By making accounts private or creating a "close friends" group, parents can ensure that only people they know and trust can see their children's photos. The guidance also suggests that parents look back at old posts to see if they should delete any images that show identifying details, such as a child’s face or their school uniform. These details can make it easier for criminals to target specific children.

Beyond personal social media, the guidance also addresses how organizations handle images. Schools and sports clubs are being encouraged to check their own websites and social media pages. In some cases, blackmailers have targeted school websites to steal photos of students, which they then turn into harmful AI content. As a result, some groups now recommend that schools remove clear photos of pupils from public view. Parents are also encouraged to revisit any consent forms they have signed, which give schools or clubs permission to publish photos of their children.

Lorna Sinclair, a child sexual abuse education manager at the NCA, explained that most parents do not realize the danger. She noted that the average person does not post a picture thinking it will be turned into illegal material. However, the technology has become so easy to use that criminals no longer need to "groom" or build a relationship with a victim to create this content. Instead, they simply take what is already available on the public internet.

For many, this advice is difficult to hear. Dan Sexton, the chief technology officer at the IWF, admitted that he feels uncomfortable telling parents they should not share photos of their children. However, he stated that he sees no other choice given the current risks. The government is also trying to help by banning certain "nudification" apps and updating laws to ensure that AI companies take responsibility for preventing their systems from being used to create abuse material.

Ultimately, the experts hope that these steps will help parents feel more in control. The guidance suggests that parents should talk to their children about how their images are used. By including children in these discussions, parents can help them understand why privacy is important and give them the confidence to say no when they do not want a photo taken or shared. While AI is becoming a part of everyday life, the NCA and IWF emphasize that simple changes to online habits can make a significant difference in protecting children from these modern digital threats.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the statistics provided by the IWF, how did the number of AI-generated abuse videos change between 2024 and 2025?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.Based on the article, why is it now easier for criminals to create harmful content compared to the past?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the third paragraph, what does the word 'scraped' mean in the context of digital images?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the primary message of the article regarding the sharing of children's photos?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

scraped verb
In this context, to automatically collect large amounts of data or images from websites using software.
(網路用語)自動抓取、蒐集網路上的大量資料或圖片。
💡 常見意思為「刮除」,這裡指網路爬蟲技術。文中:experts warn that these images can be "scraped" or collected by criminals.
groom verb
To build a relationship with a child over time to gain their trust for the purpose of sexual abuse.
(犯罪用語)誘騙、培養感情,指犯罪者長期與受害者建立信任關係以進行性剝削。
💡 常見意思為「梳理毛髮」或「打扮」,這裡指犯罪行為。文中:criminals no longer need to "groom" or build a relationship with a victim to create this content.
revisit verb
To look at or consider something again, especially to check or change it.
重新檢視、重新考慮。
💡 常見意思為「重遊(景點)」,這裡指重新審視文件。文中:Parents are also encouraged to revisit any consent forms they have signed, which give schools or clubs permission to publish photos of their children.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite