University Orders 58,000 Students to Retake Exam After AI Failure
A major Mexican university is restarting its entrance process after remote testing software led to suspicious results.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
UNAM, the largest university in Mexico, has ordered 58,000 students to retake their entrance exam. This decision follows a failed attempt to use AI-powered software to watch students during remote testing. Results from the exam showed a suspiciously high number of top scores compared to previous years. Experts believe the AI system did not work as intended, leading to widespread concerns about cheating. The university now requires an in-person test to ensure fairness for all applicants.
墨西哥規模最大的大學墨西哥國立自治大學,已要求五萬八千名學生重考入學考試。這項決定是在嘗試使用人工智慧軟體於遠端測驗期間監控學生失敗後所做出的。考試結果顯示,與往年相比,獲得高分的學生人數多得令人懷疑。專家認為人工智慧系統未如預期運作,導致外界對作弊問題產生廣泛疑慮。校方現在要求進行實體考試,以確保所有申請者的公平性。
Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞
This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.
- AI Exam System Failure Forces 58,000 Students to Retake Test
· 2026年8月4日
Nearly 160,000 students took a remote entrance exam for UNAM, Mexico's largest university, earlier this summer. The exam used new AI-powered software to watch students through their webcams. However, the results showed a strange and very large increase in high scores compared to previous years. Experts investigated the situation and concluded that the results were not reliable. Now, 58,000 students must take a new, in-person exam to ensure fairness for everyone. The university has apologized for the trouble this causes to honest students.
Thousands of students hoping to join Mexico’s largest university, UNAM, are facing an unexpected challenge. Following a failed remote testing process earlier this summer, the university has announced that 58,000 applicants must sit for a new, in-person exam. This decision comes after an investigation revealed that the AI-powered software used to monitor students during the original test did not work correctly.
Earlier this year, nearly 160,000 people took the UNAM entrance exam from their own homes. To prevent cheating, the university used a special web browser and software that used artificial intelligence to watch students through their webcams. This was the first time the school had used such technology for the entire process. However, when the results were released, they were very different from what the school had seen in the past.
According to Ars Technica, the number of students achieving top scores rose sharply. Between 2021 and 2025, only about 3.5 percent of students scored 100 or more on the 120-question test. This year, that number jumped to 16.3 percent. The results were even more unusual at the very top level, where the percentage of students scoring 110 or higher increased significantly compared to previous years. These strange results led to widespread accusations that students had cheated during the remote exam.
In response to these concerns, UNAM created a special group of experts to investigate the situation. This group, which included many professionals, recently finished its report. They concluded that the only way to make sure the process was fair was to hold a new test. This is known as a “control exam”—a test used to check or confirm the results of a previous one. The university decided that all students who were originally accepted based on their scores must now prove their knowledge again in person.
This is a difficult situation for many young people. The university rector, who is the head of the school, has publicly apologized to the students who studied hard and did not cheat. He noted that it is unfair to make honest students take the test again. However, he explained that the new exam is necessary to give certainty and guarantee equity, which means fairness and equal opportunity for everyone, in the university’s admission process.
This update follows earlier reports that the remote exam system had failed to provide reliable results. The university is now working quickly to organize the new testing schedule. With classes originally set to begin on August 10, the school faces a very tight deadline to complete the testing and finalize the list of new students. It remains unclear if the start date for the new school year will be delayed to accommodate this change.
This event highlights the risks of moving important exams to remote, AI-supervised systems. While technology can sometimes make processes easier, it can also create new problems if the systems are not fully tested or secure. For now, the students of UNAM must prepare for one more test, hoping that this time, the process will be fair and accurate for everyone involved. The university has promised to provide more details about the upcoming control exam soon, as thousands of families wait to hear how this will affect their future education.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.What change in student performance triggered the university's investigation into the remote exam?
- 推論 Inference
2.Based on the information provided, what can be inferred about the university's AI-powered monitoring software?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the fifth paragraph, what does the word 'equity' mean in the context of the university's admission process?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the primary message of the article?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- sit for phrasal verb
- To take an exam.
- 參加(考試)。
- 💡 sit 常見作「坐」,這裡與 for 連用表示參加考試。文中:the university has announced that 58,000 applicants must sit for a new, in-person exam.
- jumped verb
- To increase suddenly and by a large amount.
- (數量、價格等)突然大幅增加。
- 💡 jump 常見作「跳躍」,這裡用來形容數據的急劇上升。文中:This year, that number jumped to 16.3 percent.
- tight adjective
- Having very little time available.
- (時間)緊迫的。
- 💡 tight 常見作「緊的」,這裡形容時間安排非常吃緊。文中:the school faces a very tight deadline to complete the testing and finalize the list of new students.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite