Controversial Vaccine Trial in Guinea-Bissau Receives Approval to Proceed
Critics argue that withholding hepatitis B vaccines from newborns for research purposes is unethical and dangerous.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
A controversial medical trial in Guinea-Bissau has been given the green light to move forward. The study plans to withhold hepatitis B vaccines from some newborns to test a research theory. Many health experts have strongly criticized the project, calling it unethical and dangerous for the infants involved. Despite the backlash, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has set aside $1.6 million to support the research. Several members of the ethics committee responsible for the approval have resigned in protest.
一項在幾內亞比索進行的爭議性醫學試驗已獲准繼續進行。該研究計畫打算讓部分新生兒暫緩接種 B 型肝炎疫苗,以驗證一項研究理論。許多衛生專家強烈批評該計畫,稱其不道德且對參與的嬰兒具有危險性。儘管面臨強烈反對,美國疾病管制與預防中心仍撥款一百六十萬美元支持此項研究。負責批准該計畫的倫理委員會中,已有數名成員憤而辭職以示抗議。
Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞
This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.
- Controversial Vaccine Trial in Africa Moves Forward Despite Ethical Concerns
· 2026年10月10日
A controversial medical trial involving newborns in Guinea-Bissau has received approval to proceed. The study will withhold the hepatitis B vaccine from some infants to test a specific research theory. Health experts argue the trial is unethical because it puts babies at risk of a lifelong, dangerous infection. Several members of the ethics committee resigned in protest against the project. The U.S. government has reportedly set aside funds to support the research despite the international outcry.
- Measles Crisis Grows as Medical Experts Step In to Fill Information Gaps
· 2026年10月9日
A major measles outbreak in Pennsylvania has now reached over 1,000 confirmed cases. The situation has led to five deaths, including two infants. Because federal health agencies are facing challenges, medical societies are now creating their own vaccine recommendations. Experts describe the current federal response to the crisis as shameful. Public health leaders are calling for better coordination to manage the ongoing respiratory virus season.
A controversial medical research trial involving newborns in Guinea-Bissau has received official approval to move forward. The project, which was previously suspended due to international outcry, will study the effects of delaying the hepatitis B vaccine for infants. Under the plan, researchers intend to enroll 14,000 babies, giving the vaccine to half of them at birth while withholding it from the others for the first six weeks of life.
According to The Guardian, the ethics committee at the University of Southern Denmark voted this week to allow the trial to proceed. Officials in Guinea-Bissau have also given their support to the project. This decision comes after the country’s health minister, Quinhin Nantote, had previously announced that the study was suspended earlier this year. The approval of the new study protocol marks a significant turn in a project that has faced intense scrutiny from the global medical community.
The trial is a central part of the vaccine vision for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who serves as the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy has long expressed skepticism about vaccines and has promoted the idea of reducing the use of birth-dose vaccinations. Paul Offit, an infectious disease physician at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told The Guardian that Kennedy would not be able to conduct this trial in the United States because of its serious ethical concerns. Offit questioned whether the researchers are taking advantage of a developing country, noting that the study essentially treats some children as more expendable than others.
Ars Technica reports that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has set aside $1.6 million in its budget for the project. This funding is expected to be matched by private organizations, including the Pershing Square Foundation and the Bluebell Foundation. The decision to use public funds for this trial has caused anger among health experts, especially because the money could have been used for other urgent global health needs, such as fighting the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The research is led by Danish scientists Christine Stabell Benn and Peter Aaby. According to Ars Technica, the pair is currently under investigation by Danish authorities regarding allegations of scientific misconduct and falsification in their previous work. The trial’s design has also led to internal conflict within the oversight committee. Stig Børsen Hansen, a founding member of the review group, resigned in protest on Friday. He described the trial as a "lottery" for newborns, noting that children who are randomly chosen not to receive the vaccine face the risk of contracting a virus that can cause lifelong damage, such as liver cancer or liver cirrhosis.
In response to the growing criticism, the researchers have updated their study protocol. According to details shared with The Guardian, the team will now test mothers for hepatitis B before they give birth. If a mother tests positive, her baby will receive the vaccine and will not be part of the trial. However, babies born to mothers who test negative may still be enrolled in the study. Critics argue that this does not solve the fundamental problem, as infants can still be exposed to the virus through community contact after birth.
As of now, the CDC, the Danish research team, and the government of Guinea-Bissau have not provided further comments to the media regarding the specific concerns raised by experts. The situation remains a point of deep division in the public health world. While the researchers maintain that their study is important for testing their hypothesis, many doctors and ethicists continue to warn that the risks to the children involved are simply too high to justify the project. With the trial now moving toward the implementation phase, the international community continues to watch the situation closely to see how the researchers will address these ongoing ethical challenges.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.What is the specific procedure for infants whose mothers test positive for hepatitis B under the updated study protocol?
- 推論 Inference
2.Based on the information provided, why might the researchers have chosen Guinea-Bissau as the location for this trial?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the fifth paragraph, the word 'expendable' is used to describe how some children are treated. What does this mean in context?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the central conflict surrounding the newborn hepatitis B vaccine trial described in the article?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- set aside phrasal verb
- To reserve or allocate money for a specific purpose.
- 撥出(款項);預留
- 💡 常見作「放在一邊」,這裡指預留資金。文中:Ars Technica reports that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has set aside $1.6 million in its budget for the project.
- matched verb
- To provide an equal amount of money to correspond with another contribution.
- 常見作「配對」或「比賽」,這裡指資金的對等投入。文中:This funding is expected to be matched by private organizations, including the Pershing Square Foundation and the Bluebell Foundation.
- turn noun
- A change in the direction or development of a situation.
- 轉折;轉變
- 💡 常見作「轉彎」或「輪到」,這裡指事態的發展轉折。文中:The approval of the new study protocol marks a significant turn in a project that has faced intense scrutiny from the global medical community.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite