English News / 英文新聞閱讀
科技 · Technology · · 724 words · B1-B2

EU Fines Google €890 Million Over Competition Rules

The European Union takes major action against the tech giant for favoring its own services over rivals.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The European Union has fined Google €890 million for breaking new digital competition laws. Regulators found that the company unfairly favored its own services in search results and restricted app developers. Google has criticized the decision, claiming it will hurt the user experience for European customers. This is the first major action taken under the EU's Digital Markets Act. The company now has 60 days to change its practices or challenge the ruling in court.

歐盟因谷歌違反新的數位競爭法,對其處以八億九千萬歐元的罰款。監管機構發現該公司在搜尋結果中不公平地偏袒自家服務,並限制了應用程式開發者。谷歌批評此決定,聲稱這將損害歐洲客戶的使用體驗。這是歐盟根據「數位市場法」所採取的首次重大行動。該公司目前有六十天的時間調整其作法,或向法院挑戰此項裁決。

Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞

This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.

  • EU Fines Google Over Competition Rules · 2026年7月24日

    The European Union has fined Google €890 million for violating competition laws. The company was punished for favoring its own services in search results and limiting how app developers can offer cheaper prices. This decision follows similar fines against Apple and Meta under the Digital Markets Act. Google has criticized the ruling, claiming it will hurt European consumers and businesses. The move comes at a tense time for EU-US trade relations.

閱讀模式 ·

The European Union (EU) has issued a significant fine of €890 million to Google for violating digital competition laws. This action marks the first major enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a landmark set of rules designed to limit the power of the world’s largest technology companies. According to BBC Technology and The Guardian, the fine is divided into two parts: €460 million for favoring Google’s own travel and shopping services in search results, and €430 million for rules in the Google Play Store that prevented developers from offering cheaper prices elsewhere.

For years, European regulators have been concerned that dominant tech companies use their market position to block competition. EU competition chief Teresa Ribera stated that companies should succeed because their products are better, not simply because they own the search engine where those products appear. Henna Virkkunen, the EU tech boss, added that the goal of this decision is to ensure a fair environment where other companies can innovate and compete effectively. A senior EU official noted that European consumers will see changes in how search results appear, as the company is required to treat third-party services in a fair and non-discriminatory manner.

Google has strongly disagreed with the European Commission’s decision. Kent Walker, the company’s president of global affairs, argued that the new requirements will force Google to remove useful features that European users enjoy, such as instant pricing for flights, hotels, and restaurants. He also claimed that the changes would weaken safety protections on the Google Play Store. According to The Guardian, Walker described the fine as a result of pressure from a small group of competitors, arguing that the ruling will ultimately have a negative impact on both European businesses and the people who use Google’s services.

Despite these complaints, the European Commission remains firm. The Guardian reports that the commission has already seen Google testing changes to its search results, which officials described as substantial progress toward following the law. While some experts, such as Max von Thun from the Open Markets Institute Europe, believe the fine is only the “bare minimum” for a company with such high revenue, the decision represents a clear signal that the EU intends to enforce the DMA strictly. The commission has ordered Google to allow app developers to offer subscriptions or deals outside of the Google Play Store, giving consumers more choices.

This is not the first time Google has faced legal trouble in Europe. The company has a long history of disputes with regulators and has received billions of euros in fines over other competition cases in the past. Other major tech companies, including Apple and Meta, have also faced penalties under the DMA in recent years. Apple was previously fined €500 million for its app store practices, while Meta was fined €200 million regarding its advertising policies.

The timing of this latest fine has attracted attention, as it comes during a period of complex international trade discussions. Some reports have suggested that the decision could cause tension with the United States, particularly regarding global tariffs. However, a senior EU official insisted that the timing was not connected to any external political factors. They stated that the EU has a sovereign right—the authority to make its own laws—to regulate any company operating within its borders.

Google now faces a critical deadline. The company has 60 days to fully comply with the new regulations or choose to challenge the decision by taking the European Commission to court. If Google decides to fight the ruling, it could ask for interim measures to suspend the fine while the legal process continues. As the tech industry watches closely, the outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for how the Digital Markets Act is applied to other global tech giants in the future. For now, the focus remains on whether these changes will truly lead to a more open and competitive digital market for European users.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the article, what specific action is Google required to take regarding the Google Play Store?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.What can be inferred about the European Commission's attitude toward Google's response to the fine?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the final paragraph, what does the word 'precedent' mean in the context of the case?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the primary focus of this article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

block verb
To stop something from happening or moving forward.
阻礙、阻止。
💡 常見作名詞(街區、積木),這裡作動詞用。文中:For years, European regulators have been concerned that dominant tech companies use their market position to block competition.
firm adjective
Unwilling to change a decision or opinion; determined.
堅定的、不妥協的。
💡 常見作名詞(公司),這裡作形容詞用。文中:Despite these complaints, the European Commission remains firm.
set verb
To establish or create a standard or example for the future.
確立、樹立(先例)。
💡 常見作動詞(放置),這裡指「樹立」先例。文中:As the tech industry watches closely, the outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for how the Digital Markets Act is applied to other global tech giants in the future.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite