English News / 英文新聞閱讀
能源 · Energy · · 712 words · B1-B2

The Growing Danger of Lithium Batteries in Our Trash

New figures show that discarded batteries are causing a wave of fires at recycling centers, costing millions and putting lives at risk.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

Recycling centers across the UK are facing a serious crisis due to fires caused by lithium-ion batteries. These batteries are often found in common items like vapes, smartphones, and toys. When these items are thrown away incorrectly, they can be crushed and catch fire during the recycling process. Experts warn that the number of these incidents is rising quickly, leading to massive financial losses. There are now urgent calls for better disposal methods and new government policies to keep workers and communities safe.

英國各地的資源回收中心正因鋰離子電池引發的火災面臨嚴重危機。這些電池常存在於電子煙、智慧型手機與玩具等常見物品中。當這些物品被錯誤丟棄時,在回收過程中可能會遭到擠壓而起火。專家警告,此類事件數量正迅速攀升,導致巨大的財務損失。目前各界正緊急呼籲採取更佳的處理方式,並制定新的政府政策,以保障工作人員與社區的安全。

Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞

This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.

  • The Hidden Danger in Our Trash: Why Lithium Batteries Are Causing Fires · 2026年8月23日

    Recycling centers are experiencing a sharp increase in fires caused by lithium-ion batteries. These batteries are often found in everyday items like vapes, smartphones, and toys. Experts warn that when these batteries are crushed in waste trucks or sorting machines, they can easily catch fire. The cost of these incidents has reached an estimated £1 billion per year in the UK. Industry leaders are now calling for better disposal methods and new policies to protect workers and the environment.

閱讀模式 ·

A serious problem is growing at recycling centers and in waste trucks across the country. According to new figures from the Environment Services Association (ESA), which represents waste management companies, fires caused by wrongly thrown-away lithium-ion batteries are now happening more than 10 times every week. These batteries, commonly found in everyday items like smartphones, children’s toys, electric toothbrushes, and especially vapes, are creating a dangerous situation for workers and the public.

Following the recent fire at a recycling center in Deptford, south-east London, experts are highlighting the scale of this crisis. The ESA reported that its members dealt with 1,518 fires in the year leading up to March 2026. Out of those, at least 541 were directly linked to lithium-ion batteries. Additionally, there were 216 fires reported inside bin lorries. The ESA noted that these numbers likely underestimate the true scale of the problem, as it is often impossible to find the exact cause of a fire once it has started. They believe that while 40% of fires are officially blamed on batteries, the real number could be as high as 70%.

The financial impact of these fires is massive. The ESA estimates that the annual cost of dealing with these incidents has jumped from £150 million in 2021 to £1 billion today. This cost includes the damage to facilities, the loss of equipment, and the expensive resources needed by fire services to put out the flames. For example, a recent fire in Ilford required 25 firefighters to bring it under control. A spokesperson for the London Fire Brigade noted that these fires are very time-consuming and require a high level of resources to manage, while also causing environmental and social harm to local communities.

Dr. Francesco Restuccia, a fire expert at King’s College London, explained why these batteries are so dangerous when they reach a recycling center. He noted that there has been an exponential increase in fires because people are frequently throwing away lithium batteries in common household objects. "If they are not disposed of properly, there is a high chance of ignition," he said. When a battery is crushed in a machine or a truck, the internal parts can be pierced. This creates a short circuit, which is an electrical problem that causes the battery to heat up rapidly until it catches fire.

To demonstrate this danger, the ESA asked the Health and Safety Executive to perform a test. They punctured a vape battery while it was sitting next to paper and cardboard. The results were alarming; the vape ignited like a sparkler, reaching temperatures of over 750C. This was hot enough to set the surrounding materials on fire within minutes. This experiment serves as a clear warning about why vapes and other battery-powered items must be kept out of regular trash bins. The waste management company Biffa reported that it collected 500,000 vapes at its facilities during the summer alone, showing just how many of these devices are entering the waste stream.

In response to this growing crisis, the ESA is calling for new government action. They have proposed a £5 deposit scheme on the sale of all vapes. The idea is that if customers pay an extra fee when they buy a vape, they will be more likely to return it to a store or a proper collection point to get their money back. This would help ensure that the batteries are handled safely rather than being thrown into household bins where they can be crushed.

As fire chiefs continue to express their concern over the rise in these incidents, the message to the public is clear: batteries should never be put in regular trash or recycling bins. Whether it is a vape, a toy, or an old phone, these items require special care. Without better awareness and new policies to encourage safe disposal, the risk of fire at waste facilities will likely continue to grow, putting more lives and property in danger across the country.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the ESA's report, what is the primary reason the actual number of battery-related fires is likely higher than the official statistics suggest?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.What can be inferred about the effectiveness of the proposed £5 deposit scheme?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the fourth paragraph, what does the word 'ignition' mean as it is used in the context of the expert's explanation?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.Which statement best summarizes the central message of the article?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

underestimate verb
To think that something is smaller, less important, or less serious than it really is.
低估;對……估計不足。
💡 此詞在文中用於描述數據比實際情況更低。文中:The ESA noted that these numbers likely underestimate the true scale of the problem, as it is often impossible to find the exact cause of a fire once it has started.
bring it under control idiom
To manage to stop something (like a fire) from spreading or becoming worse.
控制住(火勢或局面)。
💡 這是一個常見的片語,用於描述成功抑制危險情況。文中:For example, a recent fire in Ilford required 25 firefighters to bring it under control.
stream noun
A continuous flow of something, in this case, waste materials moving through a system.
流;連續不斷的過程(此處指廢棄物處理流程)。
💡 常見作名詞(溪流),這裡指廢棄物處理的循環系統。文中:The waste management company Biffa reported that it collected 500,000 vapes at its facilities during the summer alone, showing just how many of these devices are entering the waste stream.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite