New York City Leads Fight Against Hidden Subscription Costs
New rules aim to stop companies from trapping customers in unwanted services and hidden fees.
🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)
Summary · 摘要
New York City has introduced strict new rules to end deceptive subscription practices. Starting in October, businesses must make it easy for customers to cancel their services. The city is also working to stop companies from hiding extra costs in housing and other goods. These changes aim to save consumers millions of dollars each year. However, some industry groups argue that these rules interfere with how businesses set their prices.
紐約市已引入嚴格的新規定,旨在終結欺騙性的訂閱行為。從十月開始,企業必須讓客戶能輕鬆取消服務。該市也致力於阻止企業在住房及其他商品中隱藏額外成本。這些變革旨在每年為消費者節省數百萬美元。然而,部分產業團體認為這些規定干預了企業的定價方式。
Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞
This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.
- New York City Takes Action Against Hidden Subscription Costs
· 2026年7月11日
New York City has introduced new rules to stop companies from using unfair subscription practices. Starting in October, businesses must make it simple for customers to cancel their services. The city is also working on a plan to force companies to show the total price of goods, including all extra fees, upfront. These changes aim to protect consumers from hidden costs that make products and housing more expensive. While the city government supports these rules, some industry groups worry that the government is interfering too much in business pricing.
New York City has taken a major step toward protecting consumers by becoming the first city in the United States to ban deceptive subscription practices. This new rule, which officially begins on October 1, targets companies that make it difficult for customers to cancel recurring charges for services like gym memberships and streaming platforms. According to The Guardian, the city’s consumer protection office is promising strong enforcement, with companies facing fines of $525 per user for failing to provide a simple way to end a subscription.
This update follows earlier efforts by the city to address what officials call "junk fees." These are extra, often hidden costs added to the price of everything from apartments to sporting events. Samuel AA Levine, the city’s commissioner of consumer and worker protection, explained that the goal is to stop companies from hiding the true cost of their products. "People shouldn’t have to wait on hold for half an hour or send a certified letter or show up to a store in person in order to cancel," Levine said in an interview with The Guardian.
Beyond subscriptions, the city is proposing new rules for the housing market, where about 70% of residents are renters. Many renters currently face a "rising tide" of extra charges, such as "boiler management" or "lifestyle" fees, which are added to the monthly rent. If these rules pass, landlords would be required to include all mandatory fees in the total price shown to potential renters. Levine noted that the current situation allows companies to compete by hiding the real price rather than by offering better value, which he argues distorts the market.
These new measures are part of a larger effort by city officials to address what they describe as predatory corporate malpractice. Levine, who previously led consumer protection at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), suggested that for the last 40 years, companies have been allowed to police their own behavior too much. He believes this lack of oversight has led to decades of deceptive pricing. The Roosevelt Institute, a thinktank, estimates that the new subscription rule alone could save New Yorkers as much as $162.5 million per year.
Despite the popularity of these rules among consumers, they have faced significant pushback from industry groups. When the federal government attempted to introduce similar rules in the past, the US Chamber of Commerce argued that such regulations were an attempt to "micromanage" how businesses set their prices. In fact, after intense lobbying by the real-estate industry, fees related to apartment rentals were removed from a federal rule proposed by the Biden administration in 2024. Additionally, a national "click-to-cancel" rule—a policy requiring that cancelling a service be as easy as signing up—was struck down by a federal judge in 2025 due to procedural issues.
While the current rules are limited to New York City, they represent a significant shift in how local governments handle corporate pricing. The city’s approach is to force transparency, requiring sellers to advertise the total price for any good or service, including all mandatory extra charges, right from the start. This move is designed to ensure that consumers know exactly what they are paying for before they commit their money.
As the October start date approaches, businesses are being warned that the city intends to enforce these rules aggressively. Companies that continue to use traps to keep customers paying for services they no longer want will face not only fines but also the requirement to pay back fees. For many New Yorkers, these changes are a welcome relief from the frustration of hidden costs and difficult cancellation processes. Whether these local rules will influence national policy remains to be seen, but for now, New York City is setting a new standard for consumer protection in the United States.
選擇題練習 · Quiz
共 4 題
- 細節 Detail
1.What is the specific financial consequence for companies that fail to provide an easy subscription cancellation process in New York City?
- 推論 Inference
2.Based on the article, what can be inferred about the relationship between the real-estate industry and government regulation?
- 單字情境 Vocabulary
3.In the third paragraph, what does the phrase 'distorts the market' mean?
- 主旨 Main Idea
4.What is the primary message of the article regarding New York City's new consumer protection measures?
易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch
這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。
- wait on hold phrasal verb
- To wait on the telephone for someone to answer or for a connection to be made.
- 在電話線上等待接通。
- 💡 這是一個常見的電話用語,容易誤解為「暫停」。文中:People shouldn’t have to wait on hold for half an hour or send a certified letter or show up to a store in person in order to cancel
- rising tide idiom
- A metaphorical way to describe a steady increase or growth of something, often something negative.
- (比喻)持續增長或蔓延的趨勢(常指負面事物)。
- 💡 字面意思是「漲潮」,這裡用來形容費用不斷增加。文中:Many renters currently face a "rising tide" of extra charges, such as "boiler management" or "lifestyle" fees, which are added to the monthly rent.
- police verb
- To monitor or control the behavior of people or organizations to ensure they follow rules.
- 監督、監管或管制(行為)。
- 💡 常見作名詞(警察),這裡作動詞用,指監管企業行為。文中:Levine, who previously led consumer protection at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), suggested that for the last 40 years, companies have been allowed to police their own behavior too much.
- struck down phrasal verb
- To officially declare that a law or rule is invalid or no longer in effect.
- (法律或規定)被廢除、被判無效。
- 💡 這是法律新聞常見的用法,指法院駁回或廢除某項規定。文中:Additionally, a national "click-to-cancel" rule—a policy requiring that cancelling a service be as easy as signing up—was struck down by a federal judge in 2025 due to procedural issues.
原始來源 · Sources
本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。
gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite