English News / 英文新聞閱讀
經濟 · Economics · · 712 words · B1-B2

New US Tariffs Create Uncertainty for Global Businesses

As the government introduces another round of taxes on imports, business leaders and experts warn of ongoing economic instability.

🕒 生成時間: (台北時間)

⚠️ 本文由 AI 綜合多家報導生成,事實請以原始來源為準。

Summary · 摘要

The United States has introduced a new series of tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on products from over 80 countries. Government officials state these taxes are necessary to fight against forced labor in international supply chains. However, business owners argue that these constant changes make it difficult to plan for the future. Experts also note that these policies have failed to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States. Many companies are now struggling with lost sales and unpredictable costs.

美國已針對超過八十個國家的產品實施百分之十至百分之十二點五的新一輪關稅。政府官員表示,這些稅收對於打擊國際供應鏈中的強迫勞動是必要的。然而,企業主認為這些持續的變動使未來規劃變得困難。專家也指出,這些政策未能將製造業工作帶回美國。許多公司目前正因銷售損失與不可預測的成本而陷入困境。

Ongoing story · 追蹤中的新聞

This article follows earlier coverage on the same developing story.

  • Global Trade Tensions Rise as New U.S. Tariffs Take Effect · 2026年7月25日

    The United States has started a new round of tariffs on over 60 countries. The U.S. government says these taxes are needed to stop forced labor in global supply chains. Many international allies have strongly criticized the decision. Leaders from Australia, New Zealand, and the European Union say the claims are not supported by evidence. The move has created significant uncertainty for businesses around the world.

  • Global Trade Tensions Rise as New US Tariffs Take Effect · 2026年7月25日

    The United States has introduced new tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on goods from 60 countries. The US government claims these taxes are necessary to address the use of forced labor in global supply chains. Many nations, including Australia, Japan, and members of the European Union, have rejected these claims as unjustified. Experts warn that these measures will likely increase costs for businesses and consumers worldwide. Meanwhile, some countries are considering new trade strategies to reduce their dependence on the American market.

閱讀模式 ·

The United States government has launched another round of tariffs — taxes on imported goods — affecting products from more than 80 countries. These new taxes, which range from 10% to 12.5%, replace a previous set that expired late last week. According to NPR Business, this move marks the latest chapter in a long period of trade instability that has left many business owners feeling frustrated and uncertain about the future.

For many companies, these changes feel like a repeating cycle of stress. Jay Foreman, the CEO of the toy company Basic Fun!, described the situation as a "Groundhog Day" scenario. He noted that this is the third major trade conflict his company has faced in the last 18 months. When trade rules change suddenly, businesses cannot plan their prices or policies effectively. Foreman explained that while a company might eventually get money back if a tariff is later found to be illegal, it is impossible to recover lost sales, lost momentum, or the profits that disappeared during the period of uncertainty.

The Trump administration claims that these new tariffs are necessary to punish countries that fail to stop the use of forced labor in their industries. However, this explanation is not accepted by everyone. Some business leaders believe the government's reasoning is "off base" and that the real impact is simply a disruption of global trade. The constant "starts and stops" in trade policy make it very difficult for companies to manage their supply chains, which are the networks of people and companies involved in moving a product from the factory to the customer.

Beyond the immediate impact on individual businesses, there is a broader question about whether these policies are achieving their main goal. Many supporters of tariffs have argued that they would encourage companies to move their factories back to the United States, thereby creating more manufacturing jobs for Americans. However, according to The Verge, there is little evidence that this is actually happening. Evan Smith, the CEO of Altana, a company that uses software to track global trade data, stated clearly that the expected return of manufacturing jobs has not occurred. Instead, the global economy has become more complex and chaotic, with trade rules changing almost daily.

This complexity is made worse by other global events. The Verge reports that the combination of unpredictable trade policies and conflicts in other parts of the world makes it very hard for companies to keep up with the current rules. Even with advanced technology like artificial intelligence, which helps companies manage their supply chains, the environment remains difficult. The pressure on important economic areas, such as the Strait of Hormuz, is expected to increase, which could lead to even more problems for international shipping.

Despite these challenges, some companies are trying to recover from previous trade battles. Foreman mentioned that his company has received back a large portion of the money it paid in earlier tariffs that were later ruled illegal by the Supreme Court. He noted that this money is being reinvested into his business, including hiring more employees and creating new products. He also expressed hope that other companies, which previously raised their prices to cover the cost of these tariffs, will now find ways to return that money to consumers through lower prices or special offers.

As the situation continues to develop, the long-term effects of these trade policies remain unclear. While the government continues to use tariffs as a tool to influence international behavior, the business community is calling for more stability. Without a clear and consistent direction, companies say they will continue to struggle with the "lost sales and lost profits" that come with a trade war. For now, the global economy remains in a state of high tension, with businesses waiting to see what the next round of policy changes will bring.

選擇題練習 · Quiz

4

  1. 細節 Detail

    1.According to the article, what is the primary reason the Trump administration gives for implementing these new tariffs?

  2. 推論 Inference

    2.What can be inferred about the effectiveness of tariffs in achieving the goal of bringing manufacturing jobs back to the U.S.?

  3. 單字情境 Vocabulary

    3.In the third paragraph, what does the phrase 'off base' most likely mean?

  4. 主旨 Main Idea

    4.What is the central message of this article regarding recent trade policies?

請回答全部 4 題後再提交

易誤解詞彙 · Words to watch

這些字字面意思和文中用法不同,或是不常見的詞性/片語。

off base idiom
Incorrect, mistaken, or not based on reality.
錯誤的、不切實際的。
💡 此片語源自棒球術語,但在這裡指觀點錯誤。文中:Some business leaders believe the government's reasoning is "off base" and that the real impact is simply a disruption of global trade.
keep up with phrasal verb
To manage to stay informed about or deal with something that is changing or moving fast.
跟上(變化或進度)。
💡 這裡指企業難以應對快速變動的貿易規則。文中:The Verge reports that the combination of unpredictable trade policies and conflicts in other parts of the world makes it very hard for companies to keep up with the current rules.
round noun
A stage or a series of actions in a process or competition.
一輪、一回合。
💡 常見作形容詞(圓的),這裡作名詞指貿易政策的階段。文中:The United States government has launched another round of tariffs — taxes on imported goods — affecting products from more than 80 countries.

原始來源 · Sources

本文內容由 AI 從以下來源綜合改寫。事實請以原始來源為準。

Generated by: gemini/gemini-3.1-flash-lite